Product Comparison
3 min read
3/1/2026
Strip Seal Expansion Joint EPDM vs Neoprene Seal Material Comparison
By Engineering Team

The choice between EPDM and neoprene rubber for strip seal expansion joint seals has a significant impact on service life and maintenance costs. Understanding the properties of each material helps engineers make the right specification decision.
EPDM rubber offers excellent resistance to UV radiation, ozone, and weathering. It maintains flexibility at temperatures down to minus 50 degrees C and performs well up to plus 150 degrees C. EPDM has good chemical resistance to water, dilute acids, and alkalis, making it suitable for bridges exposed to deicing salts. The compression set of EPDM is low, meaning it recovers well after being compressed.
Neoprene rubber has been used in bridge expansion joints for decades and has a proven track record. It offers good resistance to oil and petroleum products, which is relevant for bridges near fuel storage or refinery facilities. However, neoprene has inferior UV and ozone resistance compared to EPDM, and its low-temperature flexibility is limited to approximately minus 30 degrees C.
For most highway bridge applications in temperate climates, EPDM Grade 70 per ASTM D2000 is the preferred seal material. It provides better UV and ozone resistance, better low-temperature performance, and longer service life than neoprene. The cost premium of EPDM over neoprene is typically 15-25%, which is easily justified by the extended service life.
Neoprene remains a viable choice for bridges in warm climates where UV and ozone resistance are less critical, or for bridges near petroleum facilities where oil resistance is important. For cold climate applications below minus 30 degrees C, low-temperature EPDM or silicone rubber should be specified.
Testing requirements for both materials include hardness per ASTM D2240, tensile strength and elongation per ASTM D412, compression set per ASTM D395, and low-temperature brittleness per ASTM D2137. Material test certificates should be required from the supplier to verify compliance.